All news
The Courier Mail (Madonna King) - March 5, 2010 - Time to redefine what is mental illness
Monday, March 08, 2010
LABELLED: Alex Walsh (front), who
has Asperger's, with Tyson Keene, Alysse Keene and Sophie Walsh. Source: The Courier-Mail
THE child you now have diagnosed with Asperger's might soon be
re-diagnosed with minor autism.
And you'll think twice before reprimanding your three-year-old in a
shopping centre: a temper tantrum in a toddler is set to be re-termed a
"temper dysregulation disorder with dysphoria".
This is not
fiction, but the picture painted by proposed changes to the gospel
medical specialists use in the diagnosis of patients and to guide
research.
Yet although the recommendations – 10 years in the
making – have massive ramifications which threaten to ricochet through
our community on implementation, public debate about them remains muted.
But
now is the time to consider the consequences of this overhaul of
diagnoses by the American Psychiatric
Association for use across the world, including Australia.
It will not only broaden the definition of mental illness but
affect people's insurance, their ability to get specific types of jobs,
the type of medicines on offer, and where the big research dollars will
go. It also risks labelling our children in a way that might mark them
for life.
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, or DSM, determines how mental orders are diagnosed worldwide.
Its
draft release this week shows several changes are in the wind,
including lumping Asperger's and a host of developmental disorders into
one – "autism spectrum disorders". Asperger's would be considered a mild
form of autism.
Now just take that one change as an example. Its
affect on families with children diagnosed with Asperger's would be
huge.
Most families dealing with Asperger's do not consider it
mild. And it is valid for those same families to fear research dollars
and support programs aimed specifically at Asperger's could be
redirected into the broader autism disorder.
That's just one
example. Binge eating will become a specific disorder. So will hoarding.
Gambling,
too, will be diagnosed as a disorder – a "behavioural addiction" – but
internet addiction has been dismissed.
The disorder suffered by
Tiger Woods, in his inability to keep his private parts private, will be
termed "hypersexuality", falling just short of the "addictive" label.
The
tome, which will become operational in three years, is aimed at keeping
up to date with changes as more research becomes available and science
becomes more specific.
But it also poses a big problem. When do
you know a child's temper tantrum is a disorder, and when is it simply
bad behaviour? Could "intermittent explosive disorder" just be an excuse
for uncontrollable anger?
Do we risk over-diagnosing what might
amount to bad behaviour as a new syndrome, to the point where everyday
living presents a new round of diagnoses?
Perhaps this is best
exemplified by another change reported as part of the new document.
At
the moment, someone who rapes is a criminal: a violent person who is
held up as the reason our judges need to get tougher on crime.
But
that same person might soon be diagnosed with "paraphilic coercive
disorder" instead, a move that has enormous consequences for our court
system and whole our community.
Of course, as science becomes more
accurate, and research leads to greater understanding, the umbrella of
mental illness will change. And it has been doing that for years.
Melancholia
is now depression, shyness no longer considered a pathological
disorder, and a bad case of nerves can now be considered one of many
disorders.
But the concern being voiced in the US is that, with
pharmaceutical companies quick to jump on the bandwagon, more and more
people will turn to medicine to curb a disorder which might not require
intervention at all.
That's an important issue. Diagnosis,
particularly of a mental illness, significantly affects people's lives.
And for every wrong – or changed – diagnosis, there is immeasurable
heartache.
That's one issue. The other is an underlying fear that a
mental illness diagnosis can act as an excuse – an excuse to avoid
personal responsibility, or pass off bad behavior, or to use the system
fraudulently.
The number of people now suffering from disorders
has grown exponentially. That is largely because of better diagnosis,
but it's also about putting labels on people and ticking boxes.
Few
issues should attract the same priority as mental illness. But just as
high a priority needs to be assigned to getting it right, both in
medical terms and in terms considered acceptable in the community.
And
that's why the latest proposed changes need a full public debate, not
just in the US where the diagnostic guide is drawn up, but in Australia,
where many thousands of families will be affected.
madonnak@bigpond.net.au
Madonna
King presents Mornings each weekday from 8.30am on 612 ABC
Brisbane.
Stefanie Evans
In the News